Adam Hardens Blog

Various topics about ATVing, Technology and the Internet!

Adam Harden

Adam Harden

I am the web site administrator for the Wisconsin ATV Association as well as other various titles. Aside from ATVing, I am also a volunteer fire fighter, a fire investigator for Sheboygan County, a HAM radio operator (KX9SKY) and a free lanced web designer / graphic artist.

Blog entries tagged in utv

Brief Overview: How a WI Bill Becomes A Law (and recap of AB 453 and AB 439)

Posted by Adam Harden
Adam Harden
I am the web site administrator for the Wisconsin ATV Association as well as oth
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 in WATVA News

Randy Harden, president of the Wisconsin ATV Association and other key representatives from land managers, law enforcement and recreational riders testified in favor of both bills in front of the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

A summary of the bills is as follows:

 

Under current law, a person may not operate a snowmobile, an all-terrain 
vehicle (ATV), or a motorboat while under the influence of alcohol or a controlled 
substance to a degree that he or she cannot operate the vehicle or boat safely. Under 
current law, a personal watercraft is included in the definition of "motorboat." 
Current law also prohibits the operation of an ATV, a recreational motorboat, or a 
snowmobile by a person who has an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. For 
motorboats being operated on a commercial basis, the maximum alcohol 
concentration is 0.04. These laws are respectively referred to under current law as 
the intoxicated operation of an ATV law, the intoxicated boating law, and the 
intoxicated snowmobiling law. Under current law, a person who refuses to submit 
to a legal request for a breath, blood, or urine sample pursuant to an arrest for 
operating a snowmobile, an ATV, or a recreational motorboat while under the 
influence is in violation of what is known as the refusal law.
 
Under current law, in imposing a penalty for a violation of the intoxicated 
operation of an ATV, the intoxicated boating, or the intoxicated snowmobiling law, 
a court may only count as a previous conviction of the same law, or the applicable 
refusal law. For example, if a person is before the court for violating the intoxicated 
snowmobiling law or the snowmobile refusal law, the court may count only previous 
convictions of the intoxicated snowmobiling law and the snowmobile refusal law as 
prior convictions. Previous convictions of the intoxicated operation of an ATV law 
or of the intoxicated boating law or of the applicable refusal laws may not be counted. 
Under this bill, a court must count previous convictions of any of these intoxicated 
operation or refusal laws that occurred within the previous five years when imposing 
a penalty for a violation of any of these laws.
 
The bill makes the provisions of the intoxicated operation of an ATV, the 
intoxicated boating, and the intoxicated snowmobiling laws more consistent. These 
changes include:
 
1. Raising the age of absolute sobriety for the operation of snowmobiles and 
ATVs to 21. Current law requires absolute sobriety for persons under the age of 19 
who are operating snowmobiles and ATVs and for persons under the age of 21 for 
motorboats.
2. Adopting the higher penalties for various violations where the penalties for 
violations of the intoxicated operation of an ATV law, the intoxicated boating law, the 
intoxicated snowmobiling law, and the refusal law conflict.
3. Imposing increased penalties for violating the intoxicating boating law or the 
intoxicated snowmobiling law or related refusal law if the motorboat or snowmobile 
is operated with a passenger under 16 years of age. The increased penalty already 
exists for a violation of the intoxicated operation of an ATV law and the ATV refusal 
law.
4. Repealing the provisions that imposed increased penalties for operating an 
ATV with an alcohol concentration level that is 0.17 or more. Under current law, 
these increased penalties are not imposed for violations of the intoxicated boating or 
the intoxicated snowmobiling laws.
 
The bill provides that when counting the number of convictions within the 
previous five years, the previous convictions for intoxicated operation of that same 
type of recreational vehicle or the related refusal law that occurred before the 
effective date of this bill are counted, but previous convictions for the other two types 
of recreational vehicles that occurred before the effective date of this bill are not 
counted.
 
The bill also requires a court to enter an order to suspend the person's privilege 
to operate a snowmobile, an ATV, and a motorboat for a period of not less than 12 
months and not more that 16 months if the court imposes a penalty for a violation 
of the intoxicated operation of an ATV, the intoxicated boating, or the intoxicated 
snowmobiling law or the related refusal law. The bill also provides a forfeiture and 
additional six-month period of operating privilege suspension for violating the order 
of suspension.
 
If the person is found guilty of a violation of the intoxicated operation of an ATV, 
the intoxicated boating, or the intoxicated snowmobiling law or the related refusal 
law and has, within the previous five years, violated one of these laws, the bill 
requires the court to revoke the person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle for not 
less than six months and not more than 12 months. Under the bill, the person may 
be eligible for an occupational driver's license at any time during the revocation 
period. The bill requires the person whose operating privilege was revoked to pay a 
$140 reinstatement fee.
 
Under the bill, if a person has had his or her privilege to operate a motor vehicle 
suspended or revoked for a violation of a prohibition against operating a motor 
vehicle while intoxicated, the person may not operate a snowmobile, an ATV, or a 
motorboat during the period of that motor vehicle operating privilege suspension or 
revocation. The bill also provides a forfeiture and an additional six-month period 
of operating privilege suspension for violating the order of suspension.
 
Under current law the sentences of persons who are convicted of certain second, 
third, or fourth offenses involving the operation of a motor vehicle while under the 
influence of an intoxicant may be reduced if the violator successfully completes a 
period of probation that includes alcohol and other drug treatment. A person may 
complete a treatment program and receive a reduced period of imprisonment only 
once. This bill allows this option to be used for persons convicted of a violation of the 
intoxicated operation of an ATV, the intoxicated boating, the intoxicated 
snowmobiling law, or the applicable refusal law.
 
Under current law, with limited exceptions, no person may operate a 
snowmobile without having completed a snowmobile safety course. For persons 
under the age of 16, the course must include six hours of classroom instruction. This 
bill repeals this classroom instruction requirement.
 
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, 
the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a 
report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to 
result if the bill is enacted.
 
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be 
printed as an appendix to this bill
 
The UTV Bill:
 
Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) regulates the 
operation of all-terrain vehicles (ATVs). DNR also regulates utility terrain vehicles 
(UTVs), in consultation with the Department of Transportation, under a pilot 
program that expires on June 30, 2012.

UTV pilot program

Under current law, a UTV is defined as a motor driven device, other than a golf 
cart or low-speed vehicle, that is designed to be used primarily off of a highway and 
that has, and was originally manufactured with, certain features, including a gross 
weight of more than 900 pounds but not more than 1,999 pounds, a cargo or dump 
box, four or more low-pressure tires, non-straddling seats for at least two occupants, 
and certain safety systems.

The UTV pilot program allows DNR, a federal agency, a county, or a 
municipality to designate an ATV route or trail within its respective jurisdiction for 
use by persons operating UTVs. The UTV pilot program provides that if a county 
adopts a resolution electing to participate in the pilot program, then the resolution 
applies to all of the municipalities within the county unless a municipality adopts a 
resolution to opt out of the program.

Under the UTV pilot program, no person may operate a UTV on a designated 
ATV route or trail unless DNR registers the UTV. The UTV pilot program authorizes 
DNR to register and charge registration fees for UTVs in the same manner as it 
registers and charges registration fees for ATVs that are registered for public use 
under current law. Under the UTV pilot program, certain laws that apply to ATVs 
also apply to UTVs, including traffic citation laws, rules of operation, prohibitions 
on operation while intoxicated, and certain equipment requirements. The UTV pilot 
program prohibits a person who is younger than 16 from operating a UTV and 
requires a person who is born on or after January 1, 1988, and who operates a UTV 
to hold a valid all-terrain vehicle safety certificate.

UTV operation and funding under the bill

This bill eliminates the UTV pilot program and establishes a permanent 
method for regulating the use of UTVs on ATV routes and trails. As with the pilot 
program, the bill authorizes DNR and federal agencies, counties, and municipalities 
to designate ATV routes and trails that may be used by persons operating UTVs. 
Under the bill, as under the pilot program, most of the laws that apply to the 
operation of ATVs also apply to the operation of UTVs. As under the UTV pilot 
program, the bill allows the operation of UTVs only on those ATV routes and trails 
that are specifically designated as open to UTV operation. The bill requires DNR to 
establish uniform signs and standards for the operation of UTVs on ATV routes and 
trails. The definition of a UTV under the bill is similar to the definition under the 
pilot program except that it also specifies that a vehicle does not qualify as a UTV 
if the vehicle would meet federal motor vehicle safety standards, or if it is a dune 
buggy, mini-truck, or tracked vehicle. The bill also provides that a vehicle that 
satisfies all requirements to meet the definition of an ATV qualifies instead as a UTV 
if the vehicle exceeds the weight limit under the ATV definition.

As under the UTV pilot program, the bill generally prohibits a person under the 
age of 16 from operating a UTV. The bill authorizes a person who is under 16 years 
of age to operate a UTV if the person operates the UTV for an agricultural purpose 
and the person is under the supervision of a person who is over 18 years of age. As 
under current law, as it applies to ATV operation, these age restrictions do not apply 
to a person who operates a UTV exclusively on land under the management and 
control of the person's immediate family.

Under current law, the ATV program administered by DNR is primarily funded 
by fees generated from ATV registrations and the sale of trail passes. Under this bill, 
the UTV program is also primarily funded by UTV registrations and the sale of trail 
passes, but the bill authorizes DNR to expend these funds primarily for projects to 
improve or maintain those ATV trails that may be used by operators of UTVs.

The ATV program under current law is also funded by an annual transfer from 
the transportation fund to the conservation fund of an amount equal to the estimated 
ATV gas tax payment. The amount of the estimated ATV gas tax payment is 
calculated for each fiscal year by multiplying the number of registered ATVs (except 
those registered only for private use) by 25 gallons and then multiplying this product 
by the excise tax imposed on gasoline and diesel fuel on the last day of February of 
the previous fiscal year. This bill requires a similar annual transfer from the 
transportation fund to the conservation fund. The amount of the transfer under the 
bill is equal to the estimated UTV gas tax payment. This amount is calculated in the 
same manner as the ATV gas tax payment is calculated except that it does not 
include, in that calculation, commercial UTV registrations.

Miscellaneous provisions

This bill makes various other changes to the laws relating to ATVs. The 
changes include the following:

1. Current law does not require ATVs that are registered for public use to 
display a registration plate. This bill requires a person who owns an ATV or UTV 
that is registered for public use to furnish a plate on which the registration number 
is displayed. The bill also requires the person to affix a registration decal, furnished 
by DNR, to each side of the ATV or UTV.
2. The bill requires a person who registers an ATV or UTV for private use to 
affix a registration decal, furnished by DNR, to each side of the ATV or UTV. Current 
law does not require ATVs registered for private use to display registration decals.
3. Under current law, a manufacturer, dealer, distributor, or renter 
(commercial dealer) of ATVs must register with DNR and obtain a commercial ATV 
certificate. Upon registration, DNR issues three reflectorized plates to the 
commercial dealer and the dealer may allow the ATV to be operated only if a 
reflectorized plate is attached to the ATV. Under this bill, a commercial dealer of 
ATVs, UTVs, or both, must register with DNR and obtain a commercial ATV and 
UTV certificate. The bill requires a commercial dealer of ATVs or UTVs to display 
a plate or sign on the ATV or UTV but does not require DNR to supply reflectorized 
plates. Under the bill, DNR must issue registration decals upon registering a 
commercial dealer of ATVs or UTVs, and the commercial dealer may not allow the 
ATV or UTV to be operated without a decal affixed to the plate or sign furnished by 
the commercial dealer.
4. Under current law, with certain exceptions, a person who operates an ATV 
on a public ATV trail must obtain a nonresident trail pass from DNR and display the 
pass on the ATV. A person who registers an ATV is exempt from this requirement. 
This bill requires that a nonresident trail pass issued to an operator of an ATV or 
UTV must be permanently affixed in a highly visible location on the forward half of 
the ATV or UTV.
5. A nonresident trail pass issued under current law expires on June 30 of each 
year. This bill changes the expiration date for these annual passes to March 31 and 
authorizes DNR to issue five-day nonresident trail passes.
6. A public-use registration certificate for an ATV under current law is valid 
for a two-year period. This bill specifies that a public-use registration certificate is 
valid for both an ATV and a UTV beginning on April 1 or the date of issuance or 
renewal and ending March 31 of the second year following the date of issuance or 
renewal.
7. This bill provides that registration and nonresident trail pass requirements 
do not apply to a person operating an ATV or UTV during the first full weekend in 
June of each year.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be 
printed as an appendix to this bill.

That's in a nut shell. Above each of the linked text is the web site URL to read the full language on the bills. But we have already discussed what the bills are for. The main point of the blog is to help understand the process of a bill becoming a law.
 
Thankfully, for you and I, there is a nice document by the state government that explains this process. However, before I link that nifty document, let's have a rewind to a video that I saw in grade school, more than ten years ago! This video is based on a federal process. It's basically the same process.
 
 
So, what does our process look like in Wisconsin?
 
(Click that for a bigger image or visit page 13 here: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/assembly/acc/pdf/habbl.pdf)
 
And a chart showing the process here:
Again, click the link.
 
WOOOAAHHHh! Wait a minute. If you have been following our progress, you might notice something wrong here. On the above chart, it shows that a bill must pass the assembly before going to senate. That's true, if you're not working with elite cool law makers such as WATVA is. We actually have two bills with pretty much the same language that went to both the Senate and Assembly to expedite the process. Tricky eh? Not really. This is done a lot. If we didn't do it this way, with all the craziness in Madison, the bill might not make it to the governors desk before the session lets out for summer. I would call it being efficient, not tricky actually. 
 
Anyways, so if we follow the chart, the Senate Committee has already been presented with the senate bill, and passed it. The Assembly today got to hear the bill and it passed. Now it's on to some more committees. See the chart.
 
Before you do that, here are some photos from today's hearings.
 
That's Randy Harden presenting the OWI Bill and holding a DNR piece of literature.
 
That's Gary Eddy from the DNR Law Enforcement side testifying in favor of the OWI Bill.

And there is Randy presenting the UTV bill. 
 
So, after the other hearings and committees, the bills are sent on (if they pass) for the Governor to sign. 
 
It's not all that complicated, just takes a little reading. I suggest the booklet. I shall link it again here:
 
Make sure to watch our Facebook page as I am always updating that whenever we are in the session. 

 

Rate this blog entry

ATV / UTV Program Differences

Posted by Adam Harden
Adam Harden
I am the web site administrator for the Wisconsin ATV Association as well as oth
User is currently offline
on Monday, 30 January 2012 in WATVA News

As we are gearing up to present the final UTV program in Madison, we have created a handout that explains the differences between an ATV and UTV. The photos on the handout were taken during the 2011 WATVA VIP Ride at the Embarrass River ATV Park in Tigerton WI, where a handful of the law makers that helped draft the UTV bill participated in riding activities.

Click here to download the PDF!

Rate this blog entry
0 votes

Image IS Everything!

Posted by Adam Harden
Adam Harden
I am the web site administrator for the Wisconsin ATV Association as well as oth
User is currently offline
on Monday, 26 December 2011 in Deeper Discussions

In this day and age, when people post things to the internet, some tend to forget how easy it is to share the said published whatever. Think about that.

What I mean by the above statement is the internet is often overlooked as a small part of the lives. However, because the internet is always there, always connected and available for ANYONE, anything that you publish online can be accessed in one way or the other. 

There are plenty of places to share content. Heck, as I write this I have installed a blogging script to let me and the other bloggers to share our writings. It wasn't that hard to do. To start your own blog is easy and can be done for free using various sites. The most popular way to share content though, is widely overseen. Social Networking (see my other blog about social networking: Tweet What? Status Where? Plus Who?)... Ah yes, what couldn't be easier to share photos from your cell phone or computer than Facebook! I admit, I often post photos to facebook from my cell phone for my close friends and family to see because I want them to experience something that I have just experienced. 

This can (and very much does) be used by clubs, associations and businesses too. We post photos right to our WATVA facebook page all the time, because it's really easy right?

This is often where people stop the sharing process. They take their photos, upload them to Facebook, and wham they are done! Right?

STOP THE PRESSES... Er... Typing!

Once you upload something to the internet, the odds of ever getting it off are pretty slim. So say someone uploads a photo of Bubba riding in what appears to be a creek but in reality it's an off-road challenge course that doesn't have course markers in the photo. All of Bubba's friends think that is pretty cool, as it appears he is going to get his machine covered in mud and to Bubba, win the race. To make it easier for others to view, Bubba "tags" his local ATV club in the photo as the club did organize the event. Everyone is happy right? You may think that...

How about we take the same local club that organized the event, which is the same club that is trying to open some trails and routes in the township that has a few locals who do not support ATV / UTV development. Later that month, at a local meeting, the ATV club stands up to share their progress of getting a trail established. At this time, the few people that oppose the trail make a motion to speak and present the photo Bubba took saying these are the same club members riding off-trail somewhere destroying the environment. Of course, to the town board that doesn't ride, these photos are examples of what they do not want to see! Bubba, in the mean time, is clueless as to how they got the photos and has to try to explain they are at an event (usually in this case, none of the town board members were there to verify this and the development could be stopped right there).

Sharing photos on Facebook is simple. Finding them is also simple. The anti atv folks in the example could easily search Facebook for the clubs page. With that, they can click photos and see all the photos uploaded and tagged for that club and save them on their computer. Why would anti ATV people view the page of the ATV club? To look for examples of irresponsibility that they could use to halt opportunities to the club for trail development. 

Sound far fetched? It's not. It happens every year in Wisconsin (and around the world). The example could be used for posting photos to any web site, not just Facebook. Google has a great habit of finding your web site even if you don't insert any keywords in your coding. Thus, anyone looking to cause trouble could easily find and exploit anything on that site even if you're technically not showing anything wrong.

There is a good PSA on YouTube that you can watch below. Granted, there is no PSA on posting ATV photos (yet... dun dun dun), however apply what the video says to our sport. Also, ignore the Chinese :)

WATVA has developed a set of online guidelines to help clubs understand what they might want to post, and might not want to post. It's sad that we have to take these measures to prevent negative image, but trust me when I say in our sport image is EVERYTHING. The section of the guidelines about print and digital media are as follows:


 

With the increased popularity of All-Terrain Vehicles (ATV), there has been a significant rise in the negative depiction of ATVs in electronic and print media. This media allows vast numbers of the general public to view images of ATV usage, many of these show very inappropriate behavior. We must be sure that the images that are being portrayed by ATV users will enhance the public’s opinion of ATV use rather than detract from that view. These suggested guidelines are intended for the use by individuals and organizations involved in the planning and construction of Print and Electronic Media.

  • Images of ATV operation should not contain any views that depict OFF-TRAIL RIDING or images that the general public would interpret as being inappropriate, unethical, or illegal. If an image would appear to not be environmentally friendly please provide a caption to explain what is happening in the image. An example would be this is a closed course event such as a Mud Run taking place on private property.
  • Absolutely no images of nudity or sexual content
  • Written material should not contain any profanity
  • Images should not be digitally altered or of copyrighted material
  • Offensive content that may cause others to be offended should be avoided
  • Images should show the ATV operator wearing the recommended safety gear: helmet, eye protection, gloves, over-the ankle boots, long-sleeved shirt and long pants.
  • No more than one person should be on an ATV, unless the ATV was designed to carry two persons (in which case there should be no more than two riders)
  • The ATV should fit the operator in both physical size and engine displacement.
  • Please avoid images of alcohol and drug use
We hope that these guidelines will be helpful in your planning of how you present ATV use to the general public. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration.
 
Wisconsin ATV Association Ethics and Image TEAM
 

Those guidelines are a great way to avoid any unwanted media attention. We fight this battle everyday in fact. We know photos of trail riding can get stale after a while, but posting photos of ATVs / UTVs crawling through the mud is again, not responsible. As a statewide organization, we are put to the test often. Thus, we have a pretty diligent effort with multiple people reviewing media we publish. As should your local club.
 
So, hopefully you can take this blog to heart and think before you click publish!
Rate this blog entry

Forest County ATV Association Receives Yamaha OHV Access Initiative Grant for $8,000

Posted by Adam Harden
Adam Harden
I am the web site administrator for the Wisconsin ATV Association as well as oth
User is currently offline
on Thursday, 22 December 2011 in WATVA News

For Immediate Release

December 22nd 2011
Wisconsin ATV Association, Inc.
3321 Behrens Parkway
Sheboygan, WI 53081
www.watva.org

To: General Public

Re: Forest County ATV Association Receives Yamaha OHV Access Initiative Grant for $8,000

Sheboygan, WI - On December 20th, 2011 WATVA President Randy Harden, WATVA Special Projects Manager Hank Wozniel and NOHVIS Northeast Regional Coordinator Terry Coplien attended an award ceremony for the Forest County ATV Association as they received their $8,000 grant from Yamaha Motor Corporations OHV Access Initiative Grant. 

This grant will be used for a project that would improve existing Forest Service classified and unclassified roads for ATV travel from the Nicolet State Trail to Blackwell. The segments of the road to be utilized are in various stages of development ranging from roads with good clearing width and pit run surfacing to closed roads that are in need of clearing and grubbing and sport surfacing. An estimated 2.75 acres of clearing and grubbing will be required to remove debris and vegetation to provide a clearing wide of approximately 14 feet. Approximately 0.9 miles will require spot surfacing and leveling. New construction will be required for a distance of 0.05 miles. One drainage structure will be required on a tributary to Spencer Creek. A crossing at Forest County Highway “T” will be required. Survey, design and permits will be required for the entire project. This project would increase ATV riding opportunities in Forest County that would benefit tourism in the area. This segment is part of a larger objective of linking Forest County ATV routes and trails with Marinette County ATV trails.

Attending & speaking at the ceremony were:

  • Forest County ATV Association's President Jack Matuszewski
  • Representing Yamaha Motor Corp, from Antigo Yamaha Joe Yakey
  • RAC Committee Chairperson Tom Tallier
  • Wisconsin 12th District State Senator Jim Holperin (D)
  • Wisconsin 26th District State Representative Jeffrey Mursau (R)
  • U.S. Forest Service District Ranger Jeff Seefeldt
  • Forest County Board Chairman Erhard huettl Sr.
  • Town of Blackwell Chairman Ron Henkel
  • WATVA President Randy Harden
  • Forest County Administrator - Snowmobile Coordinator Dave Ziolkowski
Below is a video shot by WATVA President Randy Harden:
 
 
 
 
 
Rate this blog entry